Arrrghhh! 'Pirates 3' be a disappointment!
After 10 months of anxiously waiting the third installment of the "Pirates of the Caribbean" series, I was so excited to revel in another swashbuckling grand adventure of Captain Jack and company last Thursday evening.
Or so I thought.
Previously, I had written about how the director, screenwriters, and cast all acknowledged that "Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End" would be confusing. Well, as it turns out, they weren't kidding!
About half way through the movie, I realized that I had little idea of what was going on. Characters kept shifting alliances and I couldn't tell who was on whose side. It also didn't help that the film had developed about (seemingly) a hundred different storylines and I had a hard time keeping track of the plot development. Boy, no wonder critics panned the film.
Worst of all, the film is devoid of the wit and charm that made the first film, "PotC: Curse of the Black Pearl" so wonderful. Humor seemed somewhat forced, replaying some of the gags from the previous films (though it was nice to see again Mulroy and Murtogg, the two British soldiers from the first film who argued each other about the existence of the Black Pearl). Captain Jack, while always the charming scallywag, just did not have the "zing" from the original film. It was obvious that the writers did not focus on character development. But then again, how can you when you've got a hundred different plot lines to deal with?
On the plus side, the film began to pick up after about 2 hours, culminating into a grand (but perhaps borderline ludicrous) maelstrom battlescene. Without giving away the ending, I wasn't disappointed by it, but it was anti-climatic and left me somewhat dissatisfied. And of course, it left the series open to a possible 4th film.
So there you have it. I was feeling sad as I left the theater--despite the fact that the Pirates of the Caribbean trilogy was disappointing, there would be no more stories of Captain Jack (unless of course, he signs on to do a 4th film).
Oh well. The DVD comes out this December :)
Or so I thought.
Previously, I had written about how the director, screenwriters, and cast all acknowledged that "Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End" would be confusing. Well, as it turns out, they weren't kidding!
About half way through the movie, I realized that I had little idea of what was going on. Characters kept shifting alliances and I couldn't tell who was on whose side. It also didn't help that the film had developed about (seemingly) a hundred different storylines and I had a hard time keeping track of the plot development. Boy, no wonder critics panned the film.
Worst of all, the film is devoid of the wit and charm that made the first film, "PotC: Curse of the Black Pearl" so wonderful. Humor seemed somewhat forced, replaying some of the gags from the previous films (though it was nice to see again Mulroy and Murtogg, the two British soldiers from the first film who argued each other about the existence of the Black Pearl). Captain Jack, while always the charming scallywag, just did not have the "zing" from the original film. It was obvious that the writers did not focus on character development. But then again, how can you when you've got a hundred different plot lines to deal with?
On the plus side, the film began to pick up after about 2 hours, culminating into a grand (but perhaps borderline ludicrous) maelstrom battlescene. Without giving away the ending, I wasn't disappointed by it, but it was anti-climatic and left me somewhat dissatisfied. And of course, it left the series open to a possible 4th film.
So there you have it. I was feeling sad as I left the theater--despite the fact that the Pirates of the Caribbean trilogy was disappointing, there would be no more stories of Captain Jack (unless of course, he signs on to do a 4th film).
Oh well. The DVD comes out this December :)
